Perhaps it’s the fresh crisp Autumn air of Salt Lake City, but my business trip to Utah’s famous urban outpost has me thinking allot about how our community can navigate an even more prosperous future. How will we manage our success? How will we respond to adversity? How will we foster community and economic growth?
As I slowly walked back to my hotel this evening, after an ironically excellent seafood dinner at Market Street Grill here in downtown Salt Lake City, the legendary childhood tale of Stone Soup came to mind as I further contemplated future scenarios, both good and bad, for our community.
To summarize the tale, Stone Soup is essentially about hungry travelers who come across a small village and decide to take a rest. With little food to eat, they light a fire and place a pot full of water upon the flames and drop in a single stone. Curious villagers eventually approach the travelers to determine what’s going on. The travelers explain they’re making stone soup. Upon learning of the bland recipe, one-by-one the villagers bring ingredients ranging from potatoes and carrots to salt and pepper. Eventually, a hearty stew emerges as a result of the cooperative efforts of villagers working together in collaboration with the travelers. Everyone dined together and the villagers learned that no matter how difficult times got, they knew how to come together to make stone soup.
To me, Stone Soup provides a vital moral for community growth as there are no singular points of origin for the many ingredients which must be assembled to manage growth and elevate prosperity. It’s more like effective supply-chain economics or what one might call integrated community development. Success requires the coordinated efforts of many local and non-local stakeholders who possess the key ingredients which can be contributed towards the recipe for achieving and, more importantly, sustaining community prosperity.
Had the travelers been left alone to their stone soup, they may have ultimately starved. As for the villagers, if they had not been united to work together, they would never have enjoyed the delicious stew nor would they have realized the powerful value of cooperation.
How does one apply the value of cooperation to Naperville you ask? The answer resides in understanding the vital, yet not always obvious, inter-relationship between vital community assets/stakeholders. The degree to which key community stakeholders are able to join together in pursuit and promotion of mutually beneficial community goals will determine ultimate success or failure.
For example, the business community depends on a high quality system of education to cultivate a highly-skilled workforce which is a key component to a sustaining economic environment which also depends upon a strong tax base to ensure ample funds are available to be appropriated by governmental bodies for transportation and infrastructure which enables civic organizations both the audience and resources to stage events which spur residential and visitor participation in commerce which feeds back into the business community.
It’s not whether the “chicken comes before the egg”, but rather the chicken working in cooperation with the egg to coordinate a productive chain-of-events. Put yet another way, and to borrow from my home state’s motto, “United We Stand, Divided We Fall”.
The hard part comes in trying to build success upon a foundation of success, as success unfortunately tends to breed complacency and insularity. Perhaps the ultimate remedy is to get back to the basics of making a new and improved batch of stone soup before the existing stew spoils. “Hunger” is a tremendous motivational force and as a community we must stay hungry in order to sustain the momentum of our success.
Politics, in all forms, is the art of compromise. Compromise is a result of setting aside divisive differences and focusing on mutually shared interests. As we move forward in pursuit of a brighter future for Naperville, we must focus less energy on our differences and realize the power of working cooperatively toward mutually beneficial interests.
Who’s ready to make some stone soup?
It’s seems to me that the question of how to pay for downtown parking, at least the portion to be paid by those patronizing our downtown, boils down to this: At what point should they be charged?? Should it be at a meter located in the parking deck or even on the street?? Or should it be via a percentage add-on to their meal charges (1% if 75% of the downtown restaurant property owners agree to the new downtown food & beverage tax)?? The parking meter option would be arguably less convenient in that it involves fumbling around with cash or credit cards, but it would assess a parking fee based upon actual use. The 1% add-on would be more convenient to administer, especially because we’re already collecting a 1% Special Events & Cultural Amenities tax on restaurant meals city-wide, but the new 1% add-on would be assessed against even those who don’t park in our decks while dining downtown. I’d be interested in hearing which which way of assessing a parking fee is most appealing to readers of your blog. ~Bob Fieseler, Nville City Councilman.
My thanks to Councilman Fieseler for framing the parking issue so well. Even more, it’s great to see him seeking the opinion of Napervillians proactively. As I mentioned in my post above, I would love to put the question to visitors and residents alike as to what they would prefer as well as whether or not parking meters might deter their trips downtown. Personally, given the amount of time my family and I spend downtown, I would hate to see two hour meters that require constant trips back to the car to refresh the meter. It would take part of the enjoyment of spending so much time downtown. I would be happy to pay an additional 1% tax on food & beverage to preserve free parking for Naperville. Eventually, everyone who comes downtown eats or drinks something. Further, if I lived downtown or did not a need a car to get downtown, I would not mind paying the extra 1% f&b tax. Let’s keep the downtown Naperville experience as unobstructed as possible and eliminate the stress over expired parking meters when you find yourself at the opposite end of the Riverwalk. We should keep in mind, 1% of a $100 restaurant check would only be $1 extra. A much better deal than paying what would certainly be more for a parking meter not to speak of not having to worry as much over an expired meter vs. chalked tires.